Prediction of Jesper De Jong [96th] vs Arthur Rinderknech [74th] Head-to-Head At The 2025 Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W L W
Form
L W L L L L L W L WHead-To-Head: Jong 0 - 0 Rinderknech
| Jong | Stats | Rinderknech |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 96 | Ranking | 74 |
| 96 | Highest Rank | 42 |
| 24 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 11 |
| 63% (265-157) | Career Total W/L | 60% (308-209) |
| $526,725 | Career Prize Money | $1,834,590 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Jong VS Rinderknech H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jesper De Jong vs Arthur Rinderknech Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 0 - 0 Rinderknech
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 45.79% of points on their second serve, while Rinderknech has won 45.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 43.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rinderknech has won 44.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.73% and 21.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 55.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rinderknech has saved 58.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Rinderknech winning 45.9% (W/L 28/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Rinderknech has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 97/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.31% of matches (W/L 32/ 17), where as Rinderknech has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.42 while Rinderknech has played against players with an average rank of 74.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rinderknech has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 29.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rinderknech has converted 22.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Jesper De Jong
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Ivan Gakhov
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Luca Nardi
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
26
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
6
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
10
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Dmitry Popko
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Jong vs Rinderknech?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jong Vs Rinderknech is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (153/83) | Win/Loss | 61% (96/62) |
| 62% (337/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (228/159) |
| 54% (2804/2341) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1980/1700) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 818 | Aces Total | 789 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 591 | Total Double Faults | 383 |
| 1:44:22 | Average Match Time | 1:36:26 |
| 367.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.5 |
| 60% (9762/16298) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5945/9710) |
| 69% (6728/9762) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (4378/5945) |
| 51% (3335/6536) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1886/3765) |
| 43% (793/1828) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (398/991) |
| 42% (6993/16485) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3908/10046) |
| 65% (148/227) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (94/149) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 54% (39/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (27/54) |
| 57% (41/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (32/63) |
| 93% (145/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (89/77) |
| 7% (145/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (89/11) |
| 18% (91/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (69/19) |
See recent tennis photos of Jong and Rinderknech
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
